vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. (DDI) and IRONWOOD PHARMACEUTICALS INC (IRWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.0M vs $47.7M, roughly 1.7× IRONWOOD PHARMACEUTICALS INC). DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 30.2% vs -4.8%, a 34.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs -47.3%). IRONWOOD PHARMACEUTICALS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($74.6M vs $31.6M).
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a publicly traded pharmaceutical company. It was originally called Microbia, Inc.
DDI vs IRWD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $83.0M | $47.7M |
| Net Profit | $25.0M | $-2.3M |
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 42.5% | 14.3% |
| Net Margin | 30.2% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.7% | -47.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.0% | -200.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $10.11 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $47.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $122.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $85.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $90.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.0M | $91.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $88.2M | $94.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.1M | $74.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-37.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $-860.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.3M | $-4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 68.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -70.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.5% | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.0% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.2% | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -90.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.6% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.4% | -5.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.11 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.39 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.23 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $372.7M | $215.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $37.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.5M | $-261.8M |
| Total Assets | $879.8M | $396.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $215.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $140.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $92.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $108.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $88.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.7M | $88.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.2M | $105.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $309.5M | $121.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $199.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $199.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $199.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.9M | $198.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.0M | $198.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.1M | $398.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-261.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-264.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-308.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-334.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-301.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $815.5M | $-311.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $786.2M | $-321.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $755.2M | $-330.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $396.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $342.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $327.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $350.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $879.8M | $389.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $852.6M | $395.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $831.0M | $438.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.8M | $74.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.6M | $74.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 38.0% | 156.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.27× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $129.5M | $127.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $74.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.8M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.4M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.9M | $45.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $74.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.4M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.9M | $44.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 156.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.0% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.6% | 60.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.27× | 2.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.15× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
