vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Datadog (DDOG) and Evergy (EVRG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evergy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.3× Datadog). Evergy runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs 5.2%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Datadog posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.2% vs 5.3%). Datadog produced more free cash flow last quarter ($289.1M vs $-530.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Datadog's revenue compounded faster (24.9% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Datadog, Inc. is an American company that provides an observability service for cloud-scale applications, providing monitoring of servers, databases, tools, and services, through a SaaS-based data analytics platform. Founded and headquartered in New York City, the company is a publicly traded entity on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
DDOG vs EVRG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $52.6M | $84.3M |
| Gross Margin | 79.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 21.5% | 18.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.2% | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.2% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 113.4% | 7.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.15 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $953.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $885.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $826.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $761.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $737.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $690.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $645.3M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.6M | $84.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.9M | $475.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $171.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.6M | $125.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.6M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.7M | $465.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | $207.0M |
| Q1 26 | 79.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 80.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.6% | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 25.4% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 14.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | $2.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $0.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $426.4M | $19.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $10.2B |
| Total Assets | $7.0B | $33.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $426.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $401.3M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $540.6M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $489.0M | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $35.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.4M | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $411.0M | $26.1M |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $9.7B |
| Q1 26 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $33.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $33.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $32.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $32.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $32.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $32.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $31.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $334.6M | $334.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $289.1M | $-530.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.7% | -41.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 66.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.36× | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.0B | $-751.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $334.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $327.1M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.5M | $937.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.1M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.5M | $449.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.2M | $395.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $228.7M | $953.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $164.4M | $317.5M |
| Q1 26 | $289.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $318.2M | $-530.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $234.7M | $225.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $184.9M | $-303.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $262.8M | $-143.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.5M | $-118.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.3M | $427.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.0M | $-360.0M |
| Q1 26 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.4% | -41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | -22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.5% | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.9% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.8% | -25.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 66.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 41.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | 6.36× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.02× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.42× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 75.58× | 1.89× | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.02× | 3.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.82× | 5.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.42× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.75× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DDOG
Segment breakdown not available.
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
