vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Datadog (DDOG) and PLEXUS CORP (PLXS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PLEXUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $953.2M, roughly 1.1× Datadog). Datadog runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs 3.8%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Datadog posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.2% vs 9.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Datadog's revenue compounded faster (24.9% CAGR vs 7.9%).
Datadog, Inc. is an American company that provides an observability service for cloud-scale applications, providing monitoring of servers, databases, tools, and services, through a SaaS-based data analytics platform. Founded and headquartered in New York City, the company is a publicly traded entity on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
DDOG vs PLXS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $953.2M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $46.6M | $41.2M |
| Gross Margin | 80.4% | 9.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 5.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | 3.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 29.2% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.1% | -19.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.51 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $953.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $885.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $826.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $761.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $737.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $690.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $645.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $41.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 80.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.51 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $401.3M | $248.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $6.6B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $248.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $401.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $540.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $489.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $411.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $327.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $318.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 33.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.02× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.0B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $327.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $228.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $164.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $318.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $234.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $184.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $262.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 75.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.75× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DDOG
| North America | $678.7M | 71% |
| International | $274.5M | 29% |
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $612.0M | 57% |
| Americas | $345.0M | 32% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $118.0M | 11% |
