vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Datadog (DDOG) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Datadog is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($953.2M vs $508.3M, roughly 1.9× TIC Solutions, Inc.). Datadog runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs -9.3%, a 14.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Datadog produced more free cash flow last quarter ($318.2M vs $37.1M).
Datadog, Inc. is an American company that provides an observability service for cloud-scale applications, providing monitoring of servers, databases, tools, and services, through a SaaS-based data analytics platform. Founded and headquartered in New York City, the company is a publicly traded entity on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
DDOG vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $953.2M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $46.6M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | 80.4% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 29.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $953.2M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $885.7M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $826.8M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $761.6M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $737.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $690.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $645.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $611.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $46.6M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.9M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.6M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 80.4% | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 80.1% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 79.9% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.3% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.6% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $401.3M | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.6B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $401.3M | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $540.6M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $489.0M | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $411.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $282.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $327.1M | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $318.2M | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 33.4% | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.02× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.0B | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $327.1M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.5M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.1M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.5M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $228.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $164.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $212.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $318.2M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $234.7M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $184.9M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $262.8M | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $198.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 33.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 75.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.98× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DDOG
| North America | $678.7M | 71% |
| International | $274.5M | 29% |
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
