vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Deere & Company (DE) and International Paper (IP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Deere & Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.8B vs $6.0B, roughly 1.1× International Paper). Deere & Company runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 1.0%, a 11.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Deere & Company posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.0% vs -0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, International Paper's revenue compounded faster (12.3% CAGR vs -33.1%).
Deere & Company, doing business as John Deere, is an American corporation that manufactures agricultural machinery, heavy equipment, forestry machinery, diesel engines, drivetrains used in heavy equipment and lawn care equipment. It also provides financial services and other related activities.
The International Paper Company is an American pulp and paper company, the largest such company in the world. It has approximately 39,000 employees, and is headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee.
DE vs IP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.8B | $6.0B |
| Net Profit | $869.0M | $60.0M |
| Gross Margin | 26.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 12.8% | 1.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | -0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -25.0% | 157.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.19 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2B | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $-2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $75.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $869.0M | $-105.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $-147.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $150.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $498.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | -56.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | -50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | -17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | -1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.6% | 10.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.92 | $-4.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.75 | $-2.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.64 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.19 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.57 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.29 | $0.42 | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.53 | $1.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.3B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $57.3B | $8.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.0B | $14.8B |
| Total Assets | $106.0B | $36.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.21× | 0.55× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6B | $995.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $14.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.9B | $14.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.2B | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.3B | $18.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.5B | $18.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.1B | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7B | $8.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.0B | $38.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.8B | $40.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.3B | $42.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.1B | $41.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.3B | $22.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $107.8B | $23.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.6B | $23.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.62× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $94.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $553.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $905.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $605.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $476.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1B | $-288.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $397.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $521.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $365.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $94.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $255.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $150.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $54.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5B | $-618.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $137.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $309.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $167.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.4% | -10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.25× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.94× | 6.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.84× | 3.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.78× | 0.73× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DE
Segment breakdown not available.
IP
| Packaging Solutions North America | $3.6B | 61% |
| Packaging Solutions EMEA | $2.3B | 39% |
| Corporate and Inter-segment Sales | $22.0M | 0% |
