vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Deckers Brands (DECK) and WEIBO Corp (WB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Deckers Brands is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.5× WEIBO Corp). WEIBO Corp runs the higher net margin — 35.7% vs 24.6%, a 11.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Deckers Brands's revenue compounded faster (42.8% CAGR vs 22.6%).

Deckers Outdoor Corporation, doing business as Deckers Brands, is an American footwear designer and distributor founded in 1973 and based in Goleta, California. The company's portfolio of brands includes UGG, Teva, and Hoka. It was founded by Doug Otto and Karl F. Lopker.

Weibo Corporation is a Chinese social network company known for the microblogging website Sina Weibo. It is based in Beijing, China.

DECK vs WB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
DECK
DECK
1.5× larger
DECK
$2.0B
$1.3B
WB
Higher net margin
WB
WB
11.1% more per $
WB
35.7%
24.6%
DECK
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
DECK
DECK
Annualised
DECK
42.8%
22.6%
WB

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Revenue
$2.0B
$1.3B
Net Profit
$481.1M
$458.3M
Gross Margin
59.8%
Operating Margin
31.4%
29.1%
Net Margin
24.6%
35.7%
Revenue YoY
7.1%
Net Profit YoY
5.3%
EPS (diluted)
$3.33

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
$2.0B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$964.5M
$841.7M
Q1 25
$1.0B
$396.9M
Q4 24
$1.8B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$825.3M
$833.4M
Q1 24
$959.8M
$395.5M
Net Profit
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
$481.1M
Q3 25
$268.2M
$458.3M
Q2 25
$139.2M
$234.8M
Q1 25
$151.4M
$108.1M
Q4 24
$456.7M
Q3 24
$242.3M
$297.4M
Q2 24
$115.6M
$164.6M
Q1 24
$127.5M
$51.1M
Gross Margin
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
59.8%
Q3 25
56.2%
Q2 25
55.8%
Q1 25
56.7%
Q4 24
60.3%
Q3 24
55.9%
Q2 24
56.9%
Q1 24
56.2%
Operating Margin
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
31.4%
Q3 25
22.8%
29.1%
Q2 25
17.1%
30.4%
Q1 25
17.0%
27.8%
Q4 24
31.0%
Q3 24
23.3%
29.0%
Q2 24
16.1%
28.2%
Q1 24
15.0%
25.2%
Net Margin
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
24.6%
Q3 25
18.7%
35.7%
Q2 25
14.4%
27.9%
Q1 25
14.8%
27.2%
Q4 24
25.0%
Q3 24
18.5%
22.9%
Q2 24
14.0%
19.8%
Q1 24
13.3%
12.9%
EPS (diluted)
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
$3.33
Q3 25
$1.82
Q2 25
$0.93
Q1 25
$-2.78
Q4 24
$3.00
Q3 24
$1.59
Q2 24
$4.52
Q1 24
$4.82

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$2.1B
$1.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.6B
$3.9B
Total Assets
$4.1B
$6.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
$2.1B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.9B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$2.2B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.4B
$1.9B
Q1 24
$1.5B
$2.1B
Stockholders' Equity
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
$2.6B
Q3 25
$2.5B
$3.9B
Q2 25
$2.5B
$3.6B
Q1 25
$2.5B
$3.5B
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.2B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$3.4B
Q1 24
$2.1B
$3.3B
Total Assets
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
$4.1B
Q3 25
$3.8B
$6.9B
Q2 25
$3.8B
$6.5B
Q1 25
$3.6B
$6.7B
Q4 24
$4.0B
Q3 24
$3.4B
Q2 24
$3.3B
$7.1B
Q1 24
$3.1B
$7.3B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.0B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.0B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
52.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.17×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$929.1M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
$1.0B
Q3 25
$8.1M
Q2 25
$36.1M
Q1 25
$-73.0M
Q4 24
$1.1B
Q3 24
$-90.5M
Q2 24
$112.7M
Q1 24
$-28.7M
Free Cash Flow
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
$1.0B
Q3 25
$-13.9M
Q2 25
$12.2M
Q1 25
$-89.4M
Q4 24
$1.1B
Q3 24
$-113.4M
Q2 24
$90.1M
Q1 24
$-44.0M
FCF Margin
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
52.1%
Q3 25
-1.0%
Q2 25
1.3%
Q1 25
-8.8%
Q4 24
58.6%
Q3 24
-8.6%
Q2 24
10.9%
Q1 24
-4.6%
Capex Intensity
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
1.1%
Q3 25
1.5%
Q2 25
2.5%
Q1 25
1.6%
Q4 24
1.3%
Q3 24
1.7%
Q2 24
2.7%
Q1 24
1.6%
Cash Conversion
DECK
DECK
WB
WB
Q4 25
2.17×
Q3 25
0.03×
Q2 25
0.26×
Q1 25
-0.48×
Q4 24
2.40×
Q3 24
-0.37×
Q2 24
0.97×
Q1 24
-0.22×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

DECK
DECK

UGG Brand Segment$1.3B67%
Hoka Brand Segment$628.9M32%
Other Brands Segment$23.2M1%

WB
WB

Income from operations$373.2M29%
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share attributable to Weibos shareholders$268.1M21%
Shares used in computing basic net income per share attributable to Weibos shareholders$238.6M19%
Value-added services$186.1M14%
Less: Income tax expenses$113.2M9%
Investment related income, net$45.0M4%
Product development$16.7M1%
General and administrative$10.6M1%
Sales and marketing$7.1M1%
Accretion to redeemable non-controlling interests$3.0M0%

Related Comparisons