vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Defi Technologies, Inc. (DEFT) and PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.5M vs $51.3M, roughly 1.5× Defi Technologies, Inc.).
Defi Technologies Inc. is a specialized fintech enterprise focused on the decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3 space. It provides institutional and retail clients access to digital asset investment opportunities, develops blockchain infrastructure solutions, and manages portfolios of DeFi-related assets and early-stage Web3 startup stakes, serving markets across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
DEFT vs PBYI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $51.3M | $75.5M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | 22.7% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $51.3M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.8M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 75.5% |
| Q4 25 | -3.1% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.08 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $97.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $22.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $130.3M |
| Total Assets | — | $216.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $93.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $107.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $104.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $71.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $216.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $214.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-17.9M | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-17.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-27.1M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DEFT
| Revenues from realized and net change in unrealized gains (losses) | $29.3M | 57% |
| Staking and lending income | $16.8M | 33% |
| Management fees | $4.4M | 9% |
| Research revenue | $813.8K | 2% |
PBYI
Segment breakdown not available.
