vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DONEGAL GROUP INC (DGICA) and MASIMO CORP (MASI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MASIMO CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($371.5M vs $236.0M, roughly 1.6× DONEGAL GROUP INC). DONEGAL GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs -27.0%, a 31.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DONEGAL GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.7% vs -26.4%). Over the past eight quarters, DONEGAL GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (-2.2% CAGR vs -17.7%).
Donegal Group Inc. is a regional US insurance holding company offering personal and commercial property and casualty insurance products. It serves Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, and Southern US customers, delivering tailored coverage for individuals, families, and small to medium businesses.
Masimo Corporation is an American health technology and consumer electronics company headquartered in Irvine, California. The company develops patient monitoring devices, non-invasive sensors, and related software platforms used in hospital and home settings. Masimo has also operated in the consumer audio and wearable device markets.
DGICA vs MASI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.0M | $371.5M |
| Net Profit | $11.5M | $-100.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 62.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 22.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | -27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | -26.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.3% | -1124.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $236.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $239.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.9M | $371.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $247.1M | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $245.2M | $372.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $250.0M | $600.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $251.7M | $504.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $246.8M | $496.3M |
| Q1 26 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $-100.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.9M | $51.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.2M | $-170.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.0M | $-349.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.8M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $16.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 62.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 51.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 5.7% |
| Q1 26 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.3% | -45.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | -58.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $312.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $559.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $649.1M | $810.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $312.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $149.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $130.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $177.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $158.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $129.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $559.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $613.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $651.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $765.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $772.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $781.6M |
| Q1 26 | $649.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $640.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $627.4M | $810.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $584.7M | $946.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $545.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $513.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $484.1M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $56.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $50.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $191.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.4M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1M | $69.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.7M | $31.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.4M | $50.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.7M | $74.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $65.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $66.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.76× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.22× | 4.66× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
