vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Edison International (EIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Danaher Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $5.2B, roughly 1.1× Edison International). Edison International runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs 17.3%, a 18.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Edison International posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs 3.7%). Danaher Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1B vs $-319.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Edison International's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
Edison International is a public utility holding company based in Rosemead, California. Its subsidiaries include Southern California Edison, and unregulated non-utility business assets Edison Energy. Edison's roots trace back to Holt & Knupps, a company founded in 1886 as a provider of street lights in Visalia, California.
DHR vs EIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $5.2B |
| Net Profit | $1.0B | $1.8B |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 52.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | 35.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.9% | 443.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.45 | $4.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $4.3B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.0M | $832.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.0M | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $818.0M | $516.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $907.0M | $439.0M |
| Q1 26 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 52.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 56.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 20.8% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.45 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $4.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $2.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.77 | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.32 | $3.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.50 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.12 | $1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $158.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $38.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $17.6B |
| Total Assets | — | $94.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.16× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $158.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $364.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $140.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $193.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $200.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $465.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.4B | $38.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9B | $36.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | $37.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5B | $38.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0B | $35.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $34.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | $34.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.5B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1B | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3B | $16.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.8B | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5B | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.3B | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.5B | $94.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.9B | $90.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.6B | $88.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.1B | $88.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.5B | $85.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.6B | $84.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.6B | $84.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.33× | 2.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | 2.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | 2.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 2.26× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1B | $-319.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.2% | -6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 36.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.28× | 0.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3B | $-715.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $882.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $329.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $-319.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $618.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-830.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $-184.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $-326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $961.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $-1.1B |
| Q1 26 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | -6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | -4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | -8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | -25.2% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 36.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 32.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 2.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 0.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.86× | 3.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 4.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | 0.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHR
Segment breakdown not available.
EIX
| Commercial | $2.2B | 43% |
| Residential | $1.2B | 23% |
| Other | $966.0M | 19% |
| Other Operating Revenue | $802.0M | 15% |
