vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaher Corporation (DHR) and PG&E Corporation (PCG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PG&E Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.9B vs $6.0B, roughly 1.2× Danaher Corporation). Danaher Corporation runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs 12.9%, a 4.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PG&E Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, PG&E Corporation's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) is an American investor-owned utility (IOU). The company is headquartered at Kaiser Center, in Oakland, California. PG&E provides natural gas and electricity to 5.2 million households in the northern two-thirds of California, from Bakersfield and northern Santa Barbara County, almost to the Oregon and Nevada state lines.
DHR vs PCG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $6.9B |
| Net Profit | $1.0B | $885.0M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 21.4% |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | 12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.9% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.45 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | $885.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $670.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.0M | $850.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.0M | $549.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $634.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $674.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $818.0M | $579.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $907.0M | $524.0M |
| Q1 26 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 22.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 18.9% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.45 | $0.39 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.77 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.32 | $0.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.50 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.12 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | $0.24 |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.28× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $711.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $-1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $-80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $-896.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $526.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $-1.6B |
| Q1 26 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | -17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | -34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 46.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 46.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 52.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 44.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 38.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 2.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 3.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 1.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 4.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.86× | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 5.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | 1.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHR
Segment breakdown not available.
PCG
| Electric | $5.0B | 72% |
| Other | $1.9B | 28% |