vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaher Corporation (DHR) and S&P Global (SPGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Danaher Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $4.2B, roughly 1.4× S&P Global). S&P Global runs the higher net margin — 36.1% vs 17.3%, a 18.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, S&P Global posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.0% vs 3.7%). Danaher Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1B vs $919.0M). Over the past eight quarters, S&P Global's revenue compounded faster (8.4% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
S&P Global Inc. is an American publicly traded corporation headquartered in Manhattan, New York. Its primary areas of business are financial information, analytics, and energy and commodities intelligence. It is the parent company of S&P Global Ratings, S&P Global Energy, S&P Global Market Intelligence, S&P Global Mobility, and the Indian credit rating agency CRISIL. It is also the majority owner of the S&P Dow Jones Indices joint venture. "S&P" is a shortening of "Standard and Poor's".
DHR vs SPGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $4.2B |
| Net Profit | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 48.0% |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | 36.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.9% | 28.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.45 | $4.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $879.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $818.0M | $971.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $907.0M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.0% | 70.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.2% | 71.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.3% | 70.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | 69.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | 69.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.7% | 70.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.7% | 69.4% |
| Q1 26 | 22.6% | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 43.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | 41.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 40.9% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 28.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 28.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.45 | $4.69 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $3.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $3.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.77 | $3.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.32 | $3.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.50 | $2.85 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.12 | $3.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | $3.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $13.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $31.3B |
| Total Assets | — | $60.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5B | $11.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0B | $11.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | $11.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.5B | $31.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1B | $33.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3B | $33.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.8B | $33.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5B | $33.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.3B | $34.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9B | $34.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $60.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.5B | $61.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.9B | $59.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.6B | $60.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.1B | $59.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.5B | $60.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.6B | $60.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.6B | $61.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.33× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | 0.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | 0.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1B | $919.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.2% | 22.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.28× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3B | $5.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $953.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | $919.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $910.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | 18.2% | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 36.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | 24.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 47.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | 42.9% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.86× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | 1.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHR
Segment breakdown not available.
SPGI
| Ratings | $1.3B | 31% |
| Market Intelligence | $1.3B | 31% |
| Energy | $652.0M | 16% |
| Indices | $519.0M | 12% |
| Mobility | $454.0M | 11% |
