vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Danaher Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.6× Stanley Black & Decker). Danaher Corporation runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs 1.4%, a 15.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Danaher Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.7% vs 0.1%). Danaher Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1B vs $155.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Danaher Corporation's revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
DHR vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $1.0B | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.9% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.45 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.0M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $818.0M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $907.0M | $-11.2M |
| Q1 26 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.2% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.3% | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.7% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.7% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.45 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.77 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.32 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.50 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.12 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | — | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $318.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.8B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.3B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.9B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.9B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.6B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.1B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.5B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.6B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.6B | $22.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.33× | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3B | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1B | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.2% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.28× | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3B | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $573.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $485.8M |
| Q1 26 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.86× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHR
Segment breakdown not available.
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
