vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Textron (TXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Danaher Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $4.2B, roughly 1.4× Textron). Danaher Corporation runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs 5.6%, a 11.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Textron posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 3.7%). Danaher Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1B vs $527.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Textron's revenue compounded faster (15.4% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
Textron Inc. is an American industrial conglomerate based in Providence, Rhode Island. Textron's subsidiaries include Bell Textron, Kautex, Textron Aviation, and Lycoming Engines. It was founded by Royal Little in 1923 as the Special Yarns Company. In 2020, Textron employed over 33,000 people in 25 countries. The company ranked 265th on the 2021 Fortune 500 of the largest United States corporations by revenue.
DHR vs TXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $4.2B |
| Net Profit | $1.0B | $235.0M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.3% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.9% | 66.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.45 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $235.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $908.0M | $234.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.0M | $245.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $207.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $141.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $818.0M | $223.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $907.0M | $259.0M |
| Q1 26 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 58.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | 9.2% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | 7.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.45 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.32 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.50 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3B | $700.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1B | $527.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.2% | 12.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.0% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.28× | 2.98× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $5.3B | $929.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $700.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $349.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $387.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $-124.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $446.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $208.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $527.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $273.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $309.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $-180.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $293.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $293.0M |
| Q1 26 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.4% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 2.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.41× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | -0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.86× | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.85× | 0.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | 1.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DHR
Segment breakdown not available.
TXT
| Aircraft | $1.2B | 29% |
| Military Aircraft And Support Programs | $655.0M | 16% |
| Aftermarket Parts And Services | $551.0M | 13% |
| Services | $507.0M | 12% |
| Fuel Systems And Functional Components | $480.0M | 11% |
| Textron Systems | $323.0M | 8% |
| Other | $317.0M | 8% |
| US Government | $119.0M | 3% |
| Finance | $18.0M | 0% |
| Textron E Aviation Segment | $7.0M | 0% |
