vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Douglas Elliman Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.4M vs $217.6M, roughly 1.1× Dine Brands Global, Inc.). Douglas Elliman Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs -5.6%, a 33.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dine Brands Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs 0.9%). Dine Brands Global, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-8.6M vs $-14.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Douglas Elliman Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
Douglas Elliman Inc. is a leading U.S.-based residential real estate brokerage firm. It offers luxury property sales, rentals, property management, and advisory solutions, serving high-net-worth clients across key metro markets including New York, California, Florida, and Texas.
DIN vs DOUG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $245.4M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $68.6M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 27.3% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 27.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | 1243.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $245.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $262.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $271.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $253.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $243.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $266.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $285.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.2M | $200.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $-22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $-27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $-41.5M |
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | -20.7% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | -20.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $0.80 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.13 | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | $115.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $183.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $444.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | $115.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | $143.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $136.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | $136.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | $145.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $92.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.0M | $91.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $183.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $115.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $137.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $158.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $162.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $173.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-244.8M | $195.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $444.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $480.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $489.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $493.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $493.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $502.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $463.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $461.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $-14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | $-14.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | -6.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | $-17.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $642.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6M | $-27.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $-575.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $432.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $-29.4M |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | -14.7% |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.75× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
DOUG
| Commissions And Other Brokerage Income | $240.3M | 98% |
| Property Management Income | $2.8M | 1% |
| Property Management | $2.2M | 1% |