vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and IPG PHOTONICS CORP (IPGP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

IPG PHOTONICS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($274.5M vs $217.6M, roughly 1.3× Dine Brands Global, Inc.). IPG PHOTONICS CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.8% vs -5.6%, a 10.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IPG PHOTONICS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.1% vs 6.3%). IPG PHOTONICS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.9M vs $-8.6M). Over the past eight quarters, IPG PHOTONICS CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs 2.7%).

Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.

IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.

DIN vs IPGP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
IPGP
IPGP
1.3× larger
IPGP
$274.5M
$217.6M
DIN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
IPGP
IPGP
+10.9% gap
IPGP
17.1%
6.3%
DIN
Higher net margin
IPGP
IPGP
10.5% more per $
IPGP
4.8%
-5.6%
DIN
More free cash flow
IPGP
IPGP
$19.5M more FCF
IPGP
$10.9M
$-8.6M
DIN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
IPGP
IPGP
Annualised
IPGP
4.4%
2.7%
DIN

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Revenue
$217.6M
$274.5M
Net Profit
$-12.2M
$13.3M
Gross Margin
42.4%
36.1%
Operating Margin
-7.6%
1.2%
Net Margin
-5.6%
4.8%
Revenue YoY
6.3%
17.1%
Net Profit YoY
-336.1%
69.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.79
$0.30

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
$217.6M
$274.5M
Q3 25
$216.2M
$250.8M
Q2 25
$230.8M
$250.7M
Q1 25
$214.8M
$227.8M
Q4 24
$204.8M
$234.3M
Q3 24
$195.0M
$233.1M
Q2 24
$206.3M
$257.6M
Q1 24
$206.2M
$252.0M
Net Profit
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
$-12.2M
$13.3M
Q3 25
$7.3M
$7.5M
Q2 25
$13.8M
$6.6M
Q1 25
$8.2M
$3.8M
Q4 24
$5.2M
$7.8M
Q3 24
$19.1M
$-233.6M
Q2 24
$23.2M
$20.2M
Q1 24
$17.5M
$24.1M
Gross Margin
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
42.4%
36.1%
Q3 25
39.1%
39.5%
Q2 25
40.0%
37.3%
Q1 25
42.0%
39.4%
Q4 24
41.7%
38.6%
Q3 24
47.8%
23.2%
Q2 24
48.1%
37.3%
Q1 24
47.2%
38.7%
Operating Margin
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
-7.6%
1.2%
Q3 25
4.7%
3.1%
Q2 25
8.2%
0.0%
Q1 25
6.0%
0.8%
Q4 24
3.8%
6.0%
Q3 24
13.6%
-108.7%
Q2 24
15.1%
4.7%
Q1 24
11.7%
7.6%
Net Margin
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
-5.6%
4.8%
Q3 25
3.4%
3.0%
Q2 25
6.0%
2.6%
Q1 25
3.8%
1.6%
Q4 24
2.5%
3.3%
Q3 24
9.8%
-100.2%
Q2 24
11.2%
7.8%
Q1 24
8.5%
9.6%
EPS (diluted)
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
$-0.79
$0.30
Q3 25
$0.48
$0.18
Q2 25
$0.89
$0.16
Q1 25
$0.53
$0.09
Q4 24
$0.35
$0.27
Q3 24
$1.24
$-5.33
Q2 24
$1.50
$0.45
Q1 24
$1.13
$0.52

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$128.2M
$839.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-273.9M
$2.1B
Total Assets
$1.7B
$2.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
$128.2M
$839.3M
Q3 25
$167.9M
$870.4M
Q2 25
$194.2M
$899.6M
Q1 25
$186.5M
$926.9M
Q4 24
$186.7M
$930.2M
Q3 24
$169.6M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$153.5M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$145.0M
$1.1B
Total Debt
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Q1 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
$-273.9M
$2.1B
Q3 25
$-231.9M
$2.1B
Q2 25
$-212.5M
$2.1B
Q1 25
$-215.7M
$2.1B
Q4 24
$-216.0M
$2.0B
Q3 24
$-216.7M
$2.1B
Q2 24
$-231.7M
$2.3B
Q1 24
$-244.8M
$2.3B
Total Assets
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
$1.7B
$2.4B
Q3 25
$1.8B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$2.4B
Q1 25
$1.8B
$2.3B
Q4 24
$1.8B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$1.7B
$2.4B
Q2 24
$1.7B
$2.5B
Q1 24
$1.7B
$2.6B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$5.7M
$28.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-8.6M
$10.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-3.9%
4.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.6%
6.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.17×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$53.4M
$-3.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
$5.7M
$28.8M
Q3 25
$30.2M
$35.3M
Q2 25
$37.0M
$-2.2M
Q1 25
$16.1M
$13.4M
Q4 24
$30.5M
$73.8M
Q3 24
$25.5M
$66.1M
Q2 24
$21.6M
$53.5M
Q1 24
$30.6M
$54.6M
Free Cash Flow
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
$-8.6M
$10.9M
Q3 25
$18.1M
$14.6M
Q2 25
$31.0M
$-17.6M
Q1 25
$12.8M
$-11.4M
Q4 24
$26.7M
$50.6M
Q3 24
$22.0M
$43.0M
Q2 24
$18.2M
$29.2M
Q1 24
$27.2M
$26.5M
FCF Margin
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
-3.9%
4.0%
Q3 25
8.4%
5.8%
Q2 25
13.4%
-7.0%
Q1 25
6.0%
-5.0%
Q4 24
13.0%
21.6%
Q3 24
11.3%
18.4%
Q2 24
8.8%
11.3%
Q1 24
13.2%
10.5%
Capex Intensity
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
6.6%
6.5%
Q3 25
5.6%
8.3%
Q2 25
2.6%
6.1%
Q1 25
1.5%
10.9%
Q4 24
1.9%
9.9%
Q3 24
1.8%
9.9%
Q2 24
1.7%
9.4%
Q1 24
1.6%
11.1%
Cash Conversion
DIN
DIN
IPGP
IPGP
Q4 25
2.17×
Q3 25
4.12×
4.73×
Q2 25
2.68×
-0.34×
Q1 25
1.97×
3.58×
Q4 24
5.88×
9.44×
Q3 24
1.34×
Q2 24
0.93×
2.65×
Q1 24
1.75×
2.27×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

DIN
DIN

Franchisor$163.2M75%
Food And Beverage$27.3M13%
Proprietary Product Sales And Other$17.0M8%
Other$8.1M4%
Franchise And Development Fees$2.0M1%

IPGP
IPGP

Materials Processing$232.8M85%
Laser And Non Laser Systems$38.8M14%
Transferred Over Time$5.3M2%

Related Comparisons