vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Iridium Communications Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.1M vs $217.6M, roughly 1.0× Dine Brands Global, Inc.). Iridium Communications Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs -5.6%, a 15.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dine Brands Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs 1.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Iridium Communications Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
Iridium Communications Inc. is a publicly traded American company headquartered in McLean, Virginia, United States. Iridium operates the Iridium satellite constellation, a system of 80 satellites: 66 are active satellites and the remaining fourteen function as in-orbit spares. Iridium Satellites are used for worldwide voice and data communication from handheld satellite phones, satellite messenger communication devices and integrated transceivers, as well as for two-way satellite messaging se...
DIN vs IRDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $219.1M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 23.2% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $219.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $226.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $216.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $214.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $213.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $201.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $37.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $24.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $32.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 21.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | $96.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $79.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | $50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | $93.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $159.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $63.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $462.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $450.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $473.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $518.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $576.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $663.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $786.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 13.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $108.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $100.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $129.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $61.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $104.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $118.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $81.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $75.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $79.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $36.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $80.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $68.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 34.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | 2.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | 5.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | 2.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | 2.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 2.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
IRDM
| Voice and data | $57.4M | 26% |
| IoT data (2) | $46.0M | 21% |
| Government | $39.5M | 18% |
| Government service revenue (5) | $27.6M | 13% |
| Subscriber equipment | $20.2M | 9% |
| Hosted payload and other data service (4) | $14.8M | 7% |
| Broadband (3) | $12.2M | 6% |
| Commercial | $1.3M | 1% |
