vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and MAXLINEAR, INC (MXL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dine Brands Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($217.6M vs $137.2M, roughly 1.6× MAXLINEAR, INC). Dine Brands Global, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -5.6% vs -32.9%, a 27.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MAXLINEAR, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.0% vs 6.3%). Over the past eight quarters, MAXLINEAR, INC's revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
MaxLinear, Inc. is an American electronic hardware company. Founded in 2003, it provides highly integrated radio-frequency (RF) analog and mixed-signal semiconductor products for broadband communications applications. It is a New York Stock Exchange-traded company.
DIN vs MXL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $137.2M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $-45.1M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 30.0% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | -32.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 43.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | -203.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $-0.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $137.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $136.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $126.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $95.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $92.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $81.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $-14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $-49.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $-57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $-75.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $-39.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | 56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | 56.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | 55.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 54.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | -32.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | -22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | -44.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | -44.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | -32.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | -10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | -36.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -51.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | -62.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | -93.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | -42.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $-0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | $61.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | $123.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $454.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $771.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | $72.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | $111.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $108.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | $102.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | $118.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $185.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $123.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $454.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $464.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $488.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $493.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $516.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $556.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $617.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $771.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $796.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $808.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $863.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $855.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $864.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $895.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $973.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $-27.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $-2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $-13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $-34.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $-5.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | -32.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | -6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
MXL
Segment breakdown not available.
