vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.1M vs $217.6M, roughly 1.6× Dine Brands Global, Inc.). Dine Brands Global, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -5.6% vs -10.8%, a 5.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 6.3%). PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($109.2M vs $-8.6M). Over the past eight quarters, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
DIN vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | -12.3% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.2M | $269.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 83.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.2% | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.13 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | $768.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $735.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.0M | $744.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-244.8M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $114.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | $109.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | 31.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | $282.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6M | $69.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $67.1M |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.75× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
PCOR
| US | $298.3M | 85% |
| Non Us | $50.9M | 15% |
