vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and PEGASYSTEMS INC (PEGA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEGASYSTEMS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($430.0M vs $217.6M, roughly 2.0× Dine Brands Global, Inc.). PEGASYSTEMS INC runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs -5.6%, a 13.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dine Brands Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs -9.6%). PEGASYSTEMS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($206.5M vs $-8.6M). Over the past eight quarters, PEGASYSTEMS INC's revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
Pegasystems Inc. (Pega) is a global software company based in Waltham, Massachusetts, in the United States, and founded in 1983. The company has been publicly traded since 1996 as PEGA (NASDAQ). Pega is a low-code platform for workflow automation and generative AI-powered decision-making for businesses.
DIN vs PEGA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $430.0M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $32.8M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 8.6% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | -9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $430.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $504.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $381.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $384.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $490.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $325.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $351.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $234.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $85.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $6.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 75.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | 79.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | 72.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | 78.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 72.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 46.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $1.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | $270.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $705.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $270.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | $425.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | $351.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $411.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | $371.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | $740.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $703.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $665.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $705.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $787.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $596.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $624.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $611.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $585.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $473.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $435.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | $206.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | 48.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | $494.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $86.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $204.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $95.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $40.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $206.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $84.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $202.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $92.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $38.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 30.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 42.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | 2.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | 2.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 6.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
PEGA
| Pega Cloud | $205.0M | 48% |
| Subscription license | $94.9M | 22% |
| Maintenance | $75.3M | 18% |
| Consulting | $54.8M | 13% |
