vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dine Brands Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($217.6M vs $184.5M, roughly 1.2× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -5.6%, a 12.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 6.3%). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $-8.6M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 2.7%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
DIN vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $199.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.2M | $95.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.2% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $1.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.13 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $236.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-244.8M | $217.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $577.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $836.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $-22.4M |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | -23.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.75× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
