vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dine Brands Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($217.6M vs $137.0M, roughly 1.6× STRATASYS LTD.). Dine Brands Global, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -5.6% vs -40.6%, a 35.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dine Brands Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs -2.2%). STRATASYS LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.5M vs $-8.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
DIN vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.2M | $144.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.2% | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | -17.0% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | -18.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.13 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.0M | $91.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-244.8M | $866.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.75× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.
