vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dine Brands Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($217.6M vs $208.0M, roughly 1.0× VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.). VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 16.3% vs -5.6%, a 21.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dine Brands Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs -10.9%). Dine Brands Global, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-8.6M vs $-74.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Dine Brands Global, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs -3.2%).
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.VRTSEarnings & Financial Report
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.
DIN vs VRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $217.6M | $208.0M |
| Net Profit | $-12.2M | $33.9M |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 19.1% |
| Net Margin | -5.6% | 16.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.3% | -10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -336.1% | -14.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.79 | $5.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $217.6M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.2M | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.8M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.8M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.8M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.0M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.3M | $224.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.2M | $222.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8M | $42.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.2M | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $37.9M |
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 19.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | 14.5% |
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | 17.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.79 | $5.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $6.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.53 | $4.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $4.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $5.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $2.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.13 | $4.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | $390.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-273.9M | $934.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $169.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $247.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $253.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-273.9M | $934.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-231.9M | $918.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-212.5M | $896.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-215.7M | $893.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-216.0M | $897.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-216.7M | $889.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-231.7M | $868.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-244.8M | $871.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $-67.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | $-74.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $53.4M | $100.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $-67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.1M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.5M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.5M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $-74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.1M | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2M | $68.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $-36.5M |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.3% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | -16.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.12× | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.68× | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.88× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.34× | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 2.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.75× | -0.91× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
VRTS
| Open End Funds | $68.9M | 33% |
| Retail Separate Accounts | $51.3M | 25% |
| Institutional Accounts | $39.6M | 19% |
| Administration And Shareholder Service Fees | $18.4M | 9% |
| Closed End Funds | $15.9M | 8% |
| Distribution And Service Fees | $12.3M | 6% |
