vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $395.6M, roughly 1.3× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 7.8%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 7.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 13.9%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
DLB vs DT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $515.5M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $40.1M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 14.1% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 7.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | -88.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | $515.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $493.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $477.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $445.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $436.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $418.1M |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | $40.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $57.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $39.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $361.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $44.0M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | 81.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 81.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | 82.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | 80.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | 81.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | 81.4% |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 11.2% |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 82.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | 10.5% |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $1.0B |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.1B |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $3.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $33.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $27.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | 0.84× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $465.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $33.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $269.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $162.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $23.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | $27.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $262.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $148.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $20.1M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 54.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | 4.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 0.8% |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | 0.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 5.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | 4.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | 0.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
