vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($395.6M vs $184.5M, roughly 2.1× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 7.0%, a 17.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 7.1%). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 13.9%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
DLB vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $129.4M |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $32.3M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | 23.9% |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 35.4% |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | 24.9% |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $1.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $260.8M |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $665.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $-14.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $-15.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | -11.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 0.8% |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | -0.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
