vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($395.6M vs $320.9M, roughly 1.2× STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs -16.4%, a 40.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.1% vs -7.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs -40.6%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
DLB vs STRZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $320.9M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $-52.6M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | -10.8% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | -7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | -71.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $-3.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $320.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $319.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $970.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $346.9M |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $-42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $-30.6M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | — |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -4.9% |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | -8.8% |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $-3.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $-2.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $-1.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | $37.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $608.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $663.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $51.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | $200.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $229.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $608.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $611.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $663.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $712.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $-168.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $935.9M |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $7.1B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.24× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $-26.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-31.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-317.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $65.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $-335.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $9.1M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $-31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $58.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $-349.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $4.4M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | -36.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | 1.3% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 1.4% |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
