vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and Symbotic Inc. (SYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Symbotic Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($630.0M vs $395.6M, roughly 1.6× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 0.4%, a 23.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Symbotic Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.4% vs 7.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Symbotic Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.9% CAGR vs 13.9%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
Symbotic Inc. is an American robotics warehouse automation company based in Wilmington, Massachusetts.
DLB vs SYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $630.0M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 1.0% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | 29.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | 174.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | $630.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $618.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $592.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $549.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $486.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $503.6M |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $-2.5M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | 12.7% |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | -6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | -5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -4.3% |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | -0.5% |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $663.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $777.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | $954.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | $903.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $727.3M |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $663.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $221.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $210.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $197.2M |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $191.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | 73.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $530.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $-138.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $-99.4M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $197.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $-120.1M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 40.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | -23.9% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 4.1% |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | 73.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
SYM
| Systems | $590.3M | 94% |
| Operation Services | $28.8M | 5% |
| Software Maintenance And Support | $10.9M | 2% |
| Revision Of Prior Period Change In Accounting Principle Adjustment | $2.9M | 0% |
| Related Party | $1.1M | 0% |