vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($395.6M vs $220.8M, roughly 1.8× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 5.8%, a 18.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs 7.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs 9.5%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
DLB vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $196.4M |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $18.8M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | — |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 13.3% |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | 9.6% |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $161.9M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $260.2M |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $744.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $67.5M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $60.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | 30.6% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 3.8% |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | 3.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
