vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $395.6M, roughly 1.1× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 24.0%, a 24.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 7.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs 5.2%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
DLB vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $390.6M |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $201.3M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | 88.0% |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 68.9% |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | 51.5% |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $644.9M |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $-1.9B |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $253.4M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $247.8M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | 63.4% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 1.4% |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | 1.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.
