vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and WillScot Holdings Corp (WSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WillScot Holdings Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($566.0M vs $395.6M, roughly 1.4× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs -33.1%, a 57.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.1% vs -6.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
WillScot Holdings Corp is a leading provider of modular space solutions and portable storage services across North America. It serves a wide range of sectors including construction, commercial development, education, healthcare, government projects, and special events, offering flexible, scalable temporary and semi-permanent space solutions tailored to diverse client needs.
DLB vs WSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $395.6M | $566.0M |
| Net Profit | $94.9M | $-187.3M |
| Gross Margin | 88.7% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | -32.5% |
| Net Margin | 24.0% | -33.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | -6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | -310.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $-1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $395.6M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | $566.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $566.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $589.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $559.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $602.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $601.4M |
| Q2 26 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | $-187.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $43.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $43.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $-70.5M |
| Q2 26 | 88.7% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 49.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | 50.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | 53.5% |
| Q2 26 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | -32.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -5.9% |
| Q2 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | -33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | -11.7% |
| Q2 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $-1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $594.7M | $14.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $856.3M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $5.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $594.7M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $11.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B |
| Q2 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $856.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.1B |
| Q2 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $6.0B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.42× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $147.3M | $158.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $149.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $737.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | $147.3M | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $158.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $205.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $206.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $178.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $-1.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $186.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $202.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $-4.9M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | -0.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 0.6% |
| Q2 26 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | 4.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 4.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | 4.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
WSC
| Modular Space Leasing | $249.8M | 44% |
| Value Added Product And Services | $101.0M | 18% |
| Portable Storage Leasing | $83.0M | 15% |
| Delivery Revenue | $48.2M | 9% |
| Installation Revenue | $45.0M | 8% |
| Rental Units | $19.7M | 3% |
| New Units | $15.5M | 3% |
| Value Added Services | $10.3M | 2% |
| Other Leasing Related Products And Services | $3.8M | 1% |
