vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLYMPIC STEEL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($490.7M vs $346.7M, roughly 1.4× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.4% vs 0.4%, a 14.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs -2.9%). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($50.2M vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, OLYMPIC STEEL INC's revenue compounded faster (0.1% CAGR vs -2.5%).
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
DLB vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $346.7M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $53.3M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 87.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.9% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 15.4% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.4% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $346.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.6M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $304.8M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $288.8M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $364.5M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.8M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.4M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.8M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 87.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 89.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.9% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.8% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.48 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.40 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.01 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $644.6M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $644.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $702.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $699.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $626.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $482.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.0M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $825.4M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $54.8M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.2M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.5% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.03× | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $715.3M | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.7M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.9M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.8M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.3M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.3M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $181.4M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $435.9M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $168.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.2M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.7M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $172.5M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 142.0% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 97.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.3% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.57× | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.47× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.57× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.59× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.55× | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.85× | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DLB
| Licensing Brodcast Revenue | $100.3M | 29% |
| Licensing Mobile Revenue | $74.9M | 22% |
| Licensing Other Revenue | $70.2M | 20% |
| Licensing CE Revenue | $45.6M | 13% |
| Licensing PC Revenue | $28.7M | 8% |
| Products And Services | $26.9M | 8% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
