vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of dLocal Ltd (DLO) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $337.9M, roughly 1.6× dLocal Ltd). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 16.5%, a 11.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, dLocal Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (65.2% vs 3.2%).
dLocal Limited is a Uruguayan financial technology company. It provides cross-border payments connecting global merchants to emerging markets.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
DLO vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $337.9M | $542.5M |
| Net Profit | $55.6M | $151.2M |
| Gross Margin | 34.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 36.4% |
| Net Margin | 16.5% | 27.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 65.2% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 87.3% | -9.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $337.9M | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $282.5M | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.5M | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.8M | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $500.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $503.8M |
| Q4 25 | $55.6M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.3M | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.7M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.8M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.7% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.7% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.9% |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.0% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.9% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $719.9M | $211.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $86.7M | $7.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $569.4M | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $19.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.15× | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $719.9M | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $604.5M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $425.2M | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $560.5M | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $126.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $133.4M |
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.8M | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $569.4M | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $504.7M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $489.0M | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.0M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $19.5B |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.08× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $100.4M | $258.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $99.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 29.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.80× | 1.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $378.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $100.4M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $315.0M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-141.1M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.3M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $294.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $176.1M |
| Q4 25 | $99.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $313.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-141.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $107.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 110.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -69.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.80× | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.23× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.75× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.19× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
