vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of DORCHESTER MINERALS, L.P. (DMLP) and MITEK SYSTEMS INC (MITK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

MITEK SYSTEMS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.2M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.1× DORCHESTER MINERALS, L.P.). DORCHESTER MINERALS, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 38.7% vs 6.3%, a 32.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MITEK SYSTEMS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.8% vs 5.4%). Over the past eight quarters, DORCHESTER MINERALS, L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (16.2% CAGR vs -2.9%).

Dorchester Minerals, L.P. is a publicly traded master limited partnership based in the United States. It acquires, owns, and manages a diversified portfolio of royalty interests, net profit interests, and mineral properties associated with oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids production across key onshore U.S. energy basins, delivering stable cash flow returns to its unitholders.

Mitek Systems, Inc. is a software company that specializes in digital identity verification and mobile image processing using artificial intelligence. The company's software is used for depositing checks and opening bank accounts via mobile devices. It also verifies identity documents such as passports, ID cards, and driver's licenses by analyzing a selfie of an individual holding their ID, comparing their face to the photo on the document.

DMLP vs MITK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MITK
MITK
1.1× larger
MITK
$44.2M
$41.9M
DMLP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MITK
MITK
+13.4% gap
MITK
18.8%
5.4%
DMLP
Higher net margin
DMLP
DMLP
32.4% more per $
DMLP
38.7%
6.3%
MITK
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
DMLP
DMLP
Annualised
DMLP
16.2%
-2.9%
MITK

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Revenue
$41.9M
$44.2M
Net Profit
$16.2M
$2.8M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
12.3%
Net Margin
38.7%
6.3%
Revenue YoY
5.4%
18.8%
Net Profit YoY
13.7%
160.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.06

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
$41.9M
$44.2M
Q3 25
$35.4M
$44.8M
Q2 25
$32.4M
$45.7M
Q1 25
$43.2M
$51.9M
Q4 24
$39.7M
$37.3M
Q3 24
$53.5M
$43.2M
Q2 24
$37.4M
$45.0M
Q1 24
$31.0M
$47.0M
Net Profit
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
$16.2M
$2.8M
Q3 25
$11.2M
$1.9M
Q2 25
$12.3M
$2.4M
Q1 25
$17.6M
$9.2M
Q4 24
$14.2M
$-4.6M
Q3 24
$36.4M
$8.6M
Q2 24
$23.6M
$216.0K
Q1 24
$18.2M
$282.0K
Operating Margin
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
12.3%
Q3 25
10.5%
Q2 25
8.3%
Q1 25
21.9%
Q4 24
-8.3%
Q3 24
17.8%
Q2 24
1.6%
Q1 24
1.5%
Net Margin
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
38.7%
6.3%
Q3 25
31.5%
4.2%
Q2 25
38.1%
5.2%
Q1 25
40.9%
17.6%
Q4 24
35.9%
-12.4%
Q3 24
68.1%
19.8%
Q2 24
63.2%
0.5%
Q1 24
58.6%
0.6%
EPS (diluted)
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
$0.06
Q3 25
$0.04
Q2 25
$0.05
Q1 25
$0.20
Q4 24
$-0.10
Q3 24
$0.19
Q2 24
$0.00
Q1 24
$0.01

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$41.9M
$190.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$233.7M
Total Assets
$309.6M
$446.5M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.02×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
$41.9M
$190.1M
Q3 25
$41.6M
$193.0M
Q2 25
$36.5M
$167.1M
Q1 25
$41.5M
$136.2M
Q4 24
$42.5M
$121.2M
Q3 24
$56.5M
$130.3M
Q2 24
$35.2M
$123.1M
Q1 24
$37.7M
$123.9M
Total Debt
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
$4.8M
Q3 25
$4.3M
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
$2.7M
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
$233.7M
Q3 25
$240.3M
Q2 25
$237.6M
Q1 25
$220.2M
Q4 24
$200.9M
Q3 24
$214.8M
Q2 24
$209.6M
Q1 24
$216.1M
Total Assets
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
$309.6M
$446.5M
Q3 25
$330.4M
$459.1M
Q2 25
$325.6M
$446.7M
Q1 25
$349.0M
$425.3M
Q4 24
$366.8M
$396.0M
Q3 24
$403.4M
$413.8M
Q2 24
$176.0M
$409.2M
Q1 24
$184.8M
$417.0M
Debt / Equity
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
0.02×
Q3 25
0.02×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
0.01×
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$34.3M
$8.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$6.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
14.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.12×
2.89×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$60.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
$34.3M
$8.0M
Q3 25
$34.3M
$19.5M
Q2 25
$30.5M
$21.6M
Q1 25
$33.4M
$13.7M
Q4 24
$31.5M
$565.0K
Q3 24
$43.7M
$21.1M
Q2 24
$29.4M
$13.0M
Q1 24
$28.0M
$7.1M
Free Cash Flow
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
$6.6M
Q3 25
$19.2M
Q2 25
$21.2M
Q1 25
$13.5M
Q4 24
$230.0K
Q3 24
$20.8M
Q2 24
$12.6M
Q1 24
$6.6M
FCF Margin
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
14.9%
Q3 25
42.9%
Q2 25
46.5%
Q1 25
26.0%
Q4 24
0.6%
Q3 24
48.2%
Q2 24
27.9%
Q1 24
14.0%
Capex Intensity
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
3.2%
Q3 25
0.6%
Q2 25
0.7%
Q1 25
0.4%
Q4 24
0.9%
Q3 24
0.7%
Q2 24
1.0%
Q1 24
1.0%
Cash Conversion
DMLP
DMLP
MITK
MITK
Q4 25
2.12×
2.89×
Q3 25
3.07×
10.46×
Q2 25
2.47×
9.00×
Q1 25
1.89×
1.50×
Q4 24
2.21×
Q3 24
1.20×
2.46×
Q2 24
1.25×
60.12×
Q1 24
1.54×
25.05×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

DMLP
DMLP

Royalties$34.0M81%
Other$7.8M19%

MITK
MITK

Fraud And Identity Solutions$25.5M58%
License$13.9M31%
Fraud And Identity Solutions Software License And Support$3.9M9%
Professional Services And Other$1.2M3%

Related Comparisons