vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digimarc CORP (DMRC) and Sky Harbour Group Corp (SKYH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digimarc CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.9M vs $8.1M, roughly 1.1× Sky Harbour Group Corp). Sky Harbour Group Corp runs the higher net margin — 119.4% vs -47.2%, a 166.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sky Harbour Group Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (73.6% vs 2.9%). Digimarc CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($895.0K vs $-11.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Sky Harbour Group Corp's revenue compounded faster (83.1% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Digimarc Corporation is a provider of enterprise software and services. The company's software, which includes digital identifiers, is designed to address counterfeiting, product authenticity, recycling accuracy, and supply chain traceability. Digimarc products are created for multiple industries such as apparel, consumer packaged goods, health and beauty, and automotive.
Orange Sky Golden Harvest (OSGH), previously known as Golden Harvest Entertainment Group from 1970 to 2009, is a film production, distribution, and exhibition company based in Hong Kong. It dominated Hong Kong cinema box office sales from the 1970s to the 1980s, and played a major role in introducing Hong Kong action films to the world, especially those by Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, and Sammo Hung.
DMRC vs SKYH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.9M | $8.1M |
| Net Profit | $-4.2M | $9.6M |
| Gross Margin | 63.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -48.2% | -74.4% |
| Net Margin | -47.2% | 119.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.9% | 73.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 51.4% | 171.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.2M | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.2M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.2M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.7M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.6M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.8M | $-18.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.3M | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.3M | $-18.9M |
| Q4 25 | 63.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -48.2% | -74.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -109.7% | -105.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -105.2% | -114.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -128.9% | -122.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -105.1% | -115.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -120.4% | -118.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -96.2% | -137.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -109.2% | -217.3% |
| Q4 25 | -47.2% | 119.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -106.9% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -102.6% | 264.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -125.2% | -114.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -99.9% | -290.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -113.9% | -452.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -89.3% | 159.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -104.0% | -787.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.38 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.55 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.50 | $-0.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.43 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.50 | $-0.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $12.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $187.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.2M | $172.0M |
| Total Assets | $53.0M | $593.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.09× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $187.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $162.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $162.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $162.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $162.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $162.5M |
| Q4 25 | $40.2M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.4M | $163.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.5M | $167.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | $151.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.2M | $99.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.2M | $119.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.5M | $115.1M |
| Q4 25 | $53.0M | $593.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.4M | $558.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.7M | $568.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.5M | $553.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.8M | $556.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.0M | $456.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.4M | $461.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $99.7M | $444.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $991.0K | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $895.0K | $-11.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | -147.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 118.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.3M | $-26.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $991.0K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $-906.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.7M | $-944.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.1M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.8M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | $-4.4M |
| Q4 25 | $895.0K | $-11.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.8M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.2M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.9M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.5M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | -147.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -36.9% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -61.0% | -56.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -59.1% | -152.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -49.1% | -244.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -75.7% | -44.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -66.1% | -38.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -85.8% | -197.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 118.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 20.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 62.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 48.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DMRC
| Subscription | $5.3M | 60% |
| The Government | $3.6M | 41% |
SKYH
Segment breakdown not available.
