vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA) and i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
i3 Verticals, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($52.7M vs $33.4M, roughly 1.6× Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.). On growth, i3 Verticals, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-14.6% vs -23.8%). i3 Verticals, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($13.8M vs $-47.7M). Over the past eight quarters, i3 Verticals, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-4.7% CAGR vs -6.2%).
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. is an American biotech company founded in 2008 by five scientists from MIT, headed by Jason Kelly. The company specializes in using genetic engineering to produce bacteria with industrial applications for other biotech companies, saving other companies the cost of reproducing the initial stages of design in synthetic biology. The self-proclaimed "Organism Company" was one of the world's largest privately held biotech companies, valued at $4.2 billion in 2019. It...
The Prusa i3 is a family of fused filament fabrication 3D printers, manufactured by Czech company Prusa Research under the trademarked name Original Prusa i3. Part of the RepRap project, Prusa i3 printers were called the most used 3D printer in the world in 2016. The first Prusa i3 was designed by Josef Průša in 2012, and was released as a commercial kit product in 2015. The latest model is available in both kit and factory assembled versions. The Prusa i3's comparable low cost and ease of co...
DNA vs IIIV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $33.4M | $52.7M |
| Net Profit | — | $484.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -211.9% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | — | 0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.8% | -14.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -76.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.41 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $33.4M | $52.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.8M | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.6M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.3M | $63.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.8M | $52.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.0M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | $46.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.9M | $58.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $484.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-80.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.3M | $12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-91.0M | $-154.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-56.4M | $117.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-217.2M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-165.9M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | -211.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -231.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -132.1% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -184.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -236.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -62.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -396.7% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -469.1% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -207.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -121.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -188.2% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -63.3% | 368.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -386.4% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -437.3% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.41 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.45 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.10 | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.68 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.91 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.08 | $4.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.23 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.32 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $422.6M | $37.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $508.6M | $358.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $595.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $422.6M | $37.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $495.5M | $66.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $559.4M | $55.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.3M | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $561.6M | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $616.2M | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $730.4M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $840.4M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $374.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $369.6M |
| Q4 25 | $508.6M | $358.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $559.8M | $389.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $613.0M | $383.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $647.4M | $385.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $716.1M | $375.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $797.9M | $379.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $833.1M | $249.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $987.3M | $249.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $595.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $638.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $623.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $646.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $726.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $730.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $861.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $625.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-47.7M | $14.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.7M | $13.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -142.8% | 26.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 29.18× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $6.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-47.7M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.6M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.3M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.5M | $-27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-42.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-103.5M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-84.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-89.3M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.7M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-59.1M | $-27.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.1M | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-118.6M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-111.4M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-96.0M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | -142.8% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -122.4% | -43.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -128.0% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -133.2% | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -198.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -252.9% | 17.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.7% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 29.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.72× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNA
| Cell Engineering Segment | $26.0M | 78% |
| Other | $7.4M | 22% |
IIIV
| License And Service | $35.7M | 68% |
| Proprietary Payments Revenue | $14.5M | 27% |
| Other Revenue | $2.5M | 5% |
