vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH) and Lightwave Logic, Inc. (LWLG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.0K vs $159.2K, roughly 1.8× Lightwave Logic, Inc.). Lightwave Logic, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3486.6% vs -22687.3%, a 19200.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lightwave Logic, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (594.5% vs -78.6%). Lightwave Logic, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.7M vs $-47.1M).
Dianthus Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing targeted therapies for rare immunological and inflammatory diseases. It advances antibody-based candidates to address unmet needs of severe patients, operating primarily in the U.S. with global development partners.
Lightwave Logic, Inc. is a technology firm specializing in the development of advanced electro-optic polymer materials and integrated photonic devices. Its solutions target data center, telecommunications, and optical networking segments, delivering higher data transmission speeds and lower energy consumption than traditional photonic technologies.
DNTH vs LWLG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.0K | $159.2K |
| Net Profit | $-64.4M | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | -24486.3% | -3629.3% |
| Net Margin | -22687.3% | -3486.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -78.6% | 594.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -126.6% | -0.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.53 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.0K | $159.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.0K | $29.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $25.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $22.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $22.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $22.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $874.0K | $30.4K |
| Q4 25 | $-64.4M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-36.8M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-29.5M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.4M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.2M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.7M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 99.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 86.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 91.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 95.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 94.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 83.0% |
| Q4 25 | -24486.3% | -3629.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10173.7% | -17757.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -19137.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2852.7% | -21405.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2406.9% | -24879.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1376.6% | -23115.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1191.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2041.6% | -19235.5% |
| Q4 25 | -22687.3% | -3486.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9284.1% | -17488.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -19397.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2537.5% | -20495.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2144.8% | -24150.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1159.0% | -23131.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -945.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1573.0% | -18673.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.53 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.97 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.82 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.76 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.74 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.51 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.54 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $404.3M | $69.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $493.4M | $74.6M |
| Total Assets | $530.9M | $79.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $404.3M | $69.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.6M | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $263.2M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.2M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $281.1M | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.0M | $31.5M |
| Q4 25 | $493.4M | $74.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.5M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $328.6M | $31.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.5M | $33.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $337.9M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $358.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $372.7M | $37.2M |
| Q4 25 | $530.9M | $79.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.4M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.6M | $35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $354.2M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $369.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.5M | $41.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-47.0M | $-3.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-47.1M | $-3.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16591.9% | -2319.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 48.6% | 237.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-132.8M | $-15.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-47.0M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.6M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.6M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.4M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.9M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.1M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.6M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.7M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.5M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.3M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.0M | $-5.5M |
| Q4 25 | -16591.9% | -2319.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7717.2% | -11093.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -14881.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2377.8% | -18953.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2072.0% | -15134.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -980.3% | -17193.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -780.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1713.2% | -18238.4% |
| Q4 25 | 48.6% | 237.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 203.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 157.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 3724.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 1448.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 1525.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 2549.2% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
