vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp (MGY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($392.4M vs $358.5M, roughly 1.1× Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp). Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp runs the higher net margin — 28.1% vs -7.1%, a 35.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs -2.9%). Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $27.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp's revenue compounded faster (3.2% CAGR vs -5.9%).
Krispy Kreme, Inc. is an American multinational doughnut company and coffeehouse chain. Krispy Kreme was founded by Vernon Rudolph (1915–1973), who bought a yeast-raised recipe from a New Orleans chef, rented a building in 1937 in what is now historic Old Salem in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and began selling to local grocery stores. Steady growth preceded an ambitious expansion as a public company in the period 2000 to 2016, which ultimately proved unprofitable. In 2016, the company retur...
Imperial Oil Limited is a Canadian petroleum company. It is Canada's second-largest integrated oil company that is also occasionally known as Imperial Esso. It is majority-owned by American oil company ExxonMobil, with a 69.6% ownership stake in the company. It is a producer of crude oil, diluted bitumen, and natural gas. Imperial Oil is one of Canada's major petroleum refiners and petrochemical producers. It supplies Esso-brand service stations.
DNUT vs MGY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $392.4M | $358.5M |
| Net Profit | $-27.8M | $100.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 35.6% |
| Net Margin | -7.1% | 28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -23.8% | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.18 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $358.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $392.4M | $317.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $375.3M | $324.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $379.8M | $319.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $375.2M | $350.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $404.0M | $326.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $379.9M | $333.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.8M | $336.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $100.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-27.8M | $68.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.4M | $75.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-435.3M | $78.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.3M | $102.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.4M | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | $99.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.5M | $95.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.4% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | 38.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 39.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | 23.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -114.6% | 24.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | 29.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.55 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $42.4M | $124.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $911.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $650.1M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.40× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $124.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.4M | $266.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $280.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3M | $251.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.7M | $247.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $260.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4M | $276.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $275.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $911.9M | $393.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.2M | $393.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $889.4M | $392.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $935.0M | $392.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $844.5M | $392.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $804.6M | $394.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $895.0M | $394.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $650.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $670.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.0M | $197.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.1% | 40.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | 35.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-64.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $197.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $208.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $247.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.5M | $198.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.8M | $224.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $222.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $217.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.2M | $269.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-60.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 40.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.96× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.82× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DNUT
Segment breakdown not available.
MGY
| Natural gas (Mcf/d) | $193.1M | 54% |
| Natural gas revenues | $51.8M | 14% |
| Natural gas liquids revenues | $49.4M | 14% |
| Oil (Bbls/d) | $40.7M | 11% |
| Natural gas (MMcf) | $17.4M | 5% |
| Oil (MBbls) | $3.7M | 1% |
| Natural gas liquids (MBbls) | $2.7M | 1% |
