vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. (DOCN) and TASEKO MINES LTD (TGB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($242.4M vs $137.7M, roughly 1.8× TASEKO MINES LTD).
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational technology company and cloud service provider. The company is headquartered in Broomfield, Colorado, US, with 15 globally distributed data centers. DigitalOcean provides developers, startups, and SMBs with cloud infrastructure-as-a-service platforms.
Taseko Mines Limited is a mid-tier copper producer located in British Columbia, Canada. It operates Gibraltar Mine, the second largest open-pit copper mine in Canada, and is in the planning stages for several other mines including the Prosperity Mine, Harmony, and Aley. All production is sold at non-hedged market based prices. The market capitalization is currently roughly 740 million dollars.
DOCN vs TGB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $242.4M | $137.7M |
| Net Profit | $25.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | 58.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 18.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 40.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $242.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $204.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $198.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $192.5M | $137.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $184.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $158.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 58.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 60.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.39 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.39 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.15 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $254.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-28.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $254.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $387.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $428.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $439.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $419.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-69.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-175.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-210.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-203.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-211.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-253.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-286.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $57.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 10.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.23× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $180.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $57.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $31.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.73× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.72× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOCN
| Scalers | $84.3M | 35% |
| Scalers Plus | $69.9M | 29% |
| Builders | $64.1M | 26% |
| Learners Testers And Other | $24.1M | 10% |
TGB
Segment breakdown not available.
