vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) and MGIC INVESTMENT CORP (MTG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MGIC INVESTMENT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($297.1M vs $185.1M, roughly 1.6× Doximity, Inc.). MGIC INVESTMENT CORP runs the higher net margin — 55.6% vs 33.3%, a 22.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Doximity, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs -3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Doximity, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.2% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Doximity is an online networking service for medical professionals. Launched in 2010, the platform offers its members curated medical news, telehealth tools, and case collaboration.
MGIC Investment Corporation NYSE: MTG ("MGIC") is a provider of private mortgage insurance in the United States. The company is headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
DOCS vs MTG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.1M | $297.1M |
| Net Profit | $61.6M | $165.3M |
| Gross Margin | 89.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 38.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 33.3% | 55.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.1% | -10.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $297.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.1M | $298.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.5M | $304.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.9M | $304.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.3M | $306.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.6M | $301.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.8M | $306.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.7M | $305.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $165.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.6M | $169.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.1M | $191.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.3M | $192.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.5M | $185.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $184.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.2M | $200.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.4M | $204.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 90.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 89.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 89.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.9% | 71.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.8% | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.4% | 80.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.2% | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.4% | 77.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.4% | 85.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 56.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | 62.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | 63.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.2% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.6% | 61.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.3% | 65.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.7% | 66.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.31 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.27 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.22 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.8M | $235.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $979.3M | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $6.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $235.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.8M | $369.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.2M | $266.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.3M | $294.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $209.6M | $207.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $165.3M | $229.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.2M | $288.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.4M | $281.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $979.3M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $961.2M | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $913.6M | $5.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $6.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $60.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $60.9M | $230.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $93.9M | $215.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.1M | $183.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.5M | $223.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.2M | $182.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.3M | $182.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.2M | $169.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $230.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $215.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $183.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $223.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $182.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $169.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.51× | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.58× | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.87× | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.55× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.00× | 0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOCS
| Subscription | $175.4M | 95% |
| Service Other | $9.7M | 5% |
MTG
Segment breakdown not available.
