vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOMO, INC. (DOMO) and NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORP (NRUC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOMO, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($79.4M vs $53.8M, roughly 1.5× NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORP). NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORP runs the higher net margin — 41.6% vs -13.1%, a 54.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOMO, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.5% vs -52.7%). NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($105.1M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, DOMO, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.5% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Domo, Inc. is an American cloud software company based in American Fork, Utah, United States. It specializes in artificial intelligence, business intelligence, and data visualization and is designed to provide real-time access to business data for decision makers across the company with minimal IT involvement. It is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) venture.
The National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (CFC) is a member-owned nonprofit cooperative that provides financial products to America's rural electric cooperative network. CFC was established in 1969 to raise funds from the capital markets to supplement the loan programs for electric cooperatives offered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Rural Utilities Service (RUS), previously Rural Electrification Administration (REA).
DOMO vs NRUC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.4M | $53.8M |
| Net Profit | $-10.4M | $22.4M |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -13.1% | 41.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | -52.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.6% | -74.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $53.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $79.4M | $59.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.7M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.1M | $66.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $113.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.8M | $182.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $61.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-10.4M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.9M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.1M | $73.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.7M | $86.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $144.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.5M | $-163.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 41.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.1% | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | 109.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.4% | 75.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | 79.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.9% | -265.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.56 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.48 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.51 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.69 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $240.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $124.2M | $28.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-191.9M | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $201.6M | $39.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 9.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $240.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $257.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.3M | $245.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $347.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $264.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $28.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $27.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.9M | $27.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.7M | $27.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.7M | $27.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.6M | $26.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $26.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-191.9M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-191.5M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-178.7M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-177.2M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-171.2M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-163.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $39.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $201.6M | $39.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.7M | $38.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.7M | $38.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.3M | $37.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.2M | $37.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.8M | $36.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $204.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.40× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.4M | $105.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | $105.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.4% | 195.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $9.9M | $428.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $105.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $38.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $207.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $150.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.7M | $63.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $36.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $105.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | $38.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $82.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | $149.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $62.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.4M | $35.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-625.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 195.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 64.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 173.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 303.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 131.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.3% | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.7% | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.72× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMO
| Subscription | $71.9M | 91% |
| Professional Servicesand Other | $7.5M | 9% |
NRUC
Segment breakdown not available.
