vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOMO, INC. (DOMO) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOMO, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($79.4M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.6× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -13.1%, a 23.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sila Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -0.5%). Over the past eight quarters, DOMO, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.5% CAGR vs -0.6%).
Domo, Inc. is an American cloud software company based in American Fork, Utah, United States. It specializes in artificial intelligence, business intelligence, and data visualization and is designed to provide real-time access to business data for decision makers across the company with minimal IT involvement. It is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) venture.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
DOMO vs SILA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.4M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $-10.4M | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -13.1% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.6% | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $79.4M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.7M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.1M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.8M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $43.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.2M | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.4M | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.9M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.1M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.7M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.7M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | 74.2% | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.8% | 88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.4% | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.0% | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.3% | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.1% | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.3% | 89.0% |
| Q4 25 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.8% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.9% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.5% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | 29.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.56 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.45 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.45 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.48 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.51 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.69 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $32.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $124.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-191.9M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $201.6M | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.3M | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.2M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | $90.2M |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $113.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-191.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-191.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-178.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-177.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-171.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-163.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-153.5M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $201.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.7M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $204.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $225.7M | $2.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.4M | $119.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $9.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.7M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4M | $36.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-625.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMO
| Subscription | $71.9M | 91% |
| Professional Servicesand Other | $7.5M | 9% |
SILA
Segment breakdown not available.
