vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOMO, INC. (DOMO) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOMO, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($79.4M vs $46.6M, roughly 1.7× SolarMax Technology, Inc.). SolarMax Technology, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -13.1%, a 11.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs -0.5%).
Domo, Inc. is an American cloud software company based in American Fork, Utah, United States. It specializes in artificial intelligence, business intelligence, and data visualization and is designed to provide real-time access to business data for decision makers across the company with minimal IT involvement. It is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) venture.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
DOMO vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.4M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $-10.4M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | -13.1% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.6% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $79.4M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.7M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.8M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-10.4M | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.9M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.1M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.5M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 74.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.4% | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.3% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.7% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.1% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.9% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.6% | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.9% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.5% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.1% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.8% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.4% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.9% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.56 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.45 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.45 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.48 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.51 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.69 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $124.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-191.9M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $201.6M | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $113.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-191.9M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-191.5M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-178.7M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-177.2M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-171.2M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.4M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-163.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-153.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $201.6M | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.7M | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.7M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.3M | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.2M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.8M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $204.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $225.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.4M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $9.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-625.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMO
| Subscription | $71.9M | 91% |
| Professional Servicesand Other | $7.5M | 9% |
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
