vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOMO, INC. (DOMO) and ThredUp Inc. (TDUP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ThredUp Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($79.7M vs $79.4M, roughly 1.0× DOMO, INC.). ThredUp Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.0% vs -13.1%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ThredUp Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.5% vs -0.5%). DOMO, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1M vs $-3.2M). Over the past eight quarters, ThredUp Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs -0.5%).
Domo, Inc. is an American cloud software company based in American Fork, Utah, United States. It specializes in artificial intelligence, business intelligence, and data visualization and is designed to provide real-time access to business data for decision makers across the company with minimal IT involvement. It is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) venture.
ThredUp Inc. is an American company that operates an online resale platform specializing in the sale of second-hand clothing, footwear, and accessories. Founded in 2009 and headquartered in Oakland, California, it has established itself as one of the leading resale fashion marketplaces.
DOMO vs TDUP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $79.4M | $79.7M |
| Net Profit | $-10.4M | $-5.6M |
| Gross Margin | 74.2% | 79.6% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | -8.4% |
| Net Margin | -13.1% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 18.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.6% | 74.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.25 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $79.4M | $79.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.7M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.1M | $77.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $71.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.8M | $67.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.1M | $66.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.2M | $64.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.4M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.9M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.1M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.7M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.5M | $-24.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.0M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.7M | $-16.6M |
| Q4 25 | 74.2% | 79.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.8% | 79.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | 79.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.4% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.0% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.3% | 79.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.1% | 78.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.3% | 80.1% |
| Q4 25 | -8.7% | -8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.1% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.9% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.6% | -7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.9% | -12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.5% | -17.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.8% | -14.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.6% | -19.2% |
| Q4 25 | -13.1% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.8% | -5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.4% | -7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.5% | -32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.9% | -40.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.5% | -20.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | -25.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.25 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.56 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.45 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.45 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.48 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.51 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.69 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $-0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $38.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $124.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-191.9M | $59.2M |
| Total Assets | $201.6M | $167.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $46.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $41.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.3M | $41.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.2M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.9M | $50.1M |
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $113.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-191.9M | $59.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-191.5M | $59.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-178.7M | $60.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-177.2M | $56.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-171.2M | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.4M | $69.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-163.5M | $86.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-153.5M | $93.5M |
| Q4 25 | $201.6M | $167.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.7M | $172.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.7M | $173.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.3M | $172.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.2M | $171.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.8M | $214.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $204.4M | $231.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $225.7M | $244.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.4M | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.1M | $-3.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.4% | -4.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $9.9M | $180.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $344.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.7M | $663.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-625.0K | $-5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | $267.0K |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.3% | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.8% | -8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 1.7% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOMO
| Subscription | $71.9M | 91% |
| Professional Servicesand Other | $7.5M | 9% |
TDUP
Segment breakdown not available.
