vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) and Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($420.0M vs $245.4M, roughly 1.7× Douglas Elliman Inc.). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs 27.9%, a 29.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.3% vs 0.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Douglas Elliman Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs 5.0%).
Douglas Elliman Inc. is a leading U.S.-based residential real estate brokerage firm. It offers luxury property sales, rentals, property management, and advisory solutions, serving high-net-worth clients across key metro markets including New York, California, Florida, and Texas.
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
DOUG vs GLPI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $245.4M | $420.0M |
| Net Profit | $68.6M | $239.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 27.3% | 79.4% |
| Net Margin | 27.9% | 57.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.9% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1243.4% | 40.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.80 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $245.4M | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.8M | $397.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.4M | $394.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.4M | $395.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $243.3M | $389.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.3M | $385.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $285.8M | $380.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.6M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.7M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.7M | $151.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | $165.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.0M | $223.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.2M | $184.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $208.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | 89.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.1% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 65.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.7% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.8% | 70.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 77.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.4% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.5% | 57.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.2% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.6% | 54.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.80 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.29 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.27 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $115.5M | $274.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $183.9M | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $444.4M | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $274.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $115.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.5M | $560.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.4M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.9M | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $183.9M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.1M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.6M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $158.2M | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.2M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.6M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $444.4M | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $489.0M | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.9M | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $493.9M | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $502.7M | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.9M | $11.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-14.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.21× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-17.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.0K | $293.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.6M | $252.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $270.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $252.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $183.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-575.0K | $272.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.7M | $239.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | $261.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.0K | $245.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.2% | 275.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 64.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.21× | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOUG
| Commissions And Other Brokerage Income | $240.3M | 98% |
| Property Management Income | $2.8M | 1% |
| Property Management | $2.2M | 1% |
GLPI
Segment breakdown not available.
