vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Douglas Elliman Inc. (DOUG) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Douglas Elliman Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.4M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.0× Tecnoglass Inc.). Douglas Elliman Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 10.6%, a 17.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tecnoglass Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.4% vs 0.9%). Tecnoglass Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.4M vs $-14.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 10.7%).
Douglas Elliman Inc. is a leading U.S.-based residential real estate brokerage firm. It offers luxury property sales, rentals, property management, and advisory solutions, serving high-net-worth clients across key metro markets including New York, California, Florida, and Texas.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
DOUG vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $245.4M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $68.6M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 27.3% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 27.9% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.9% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1243.4% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.80 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $245.4M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.8M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.4M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.4M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $243.3M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $266.3M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $285.8M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $200.2M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $68.6M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.7M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.7M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.2M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.7M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.5M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.1% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.7% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.7% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.5% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.6% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.7% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.80 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.29 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.27 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.50 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $115.5M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $183.9M | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $444.4M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $115.5M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.0M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.3M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.5M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.4M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.9M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $91.5M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | $183.9M | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.1M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.6M | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $158.2M | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.2M | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $173.6M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.9M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $195.1M | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | $444.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $489.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $493.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $502.7M | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.9M | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $461.1M | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.4M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-14.7M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.0% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.21× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-17.2M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-14.4M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.0K | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.6M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.3M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-575.0K | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.7M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.2M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.0K | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.4M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | -6.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.7% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.21× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOUG
| Commissions And Other Brokerage Income | $240.3M | 98% |
| Property Management Income | $2.8M | 1% |
| Property Management | $2.2M | 1% |
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
