vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dover Corporation (DOV) and LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC (LSAK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.4× Dover Corporation). Dover Corporation runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 0.0%, a 13.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dover Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.5% vs 0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (341.6% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Dover Corporation is an American conglomerate manufacturer of industrial products. The Downers Grove, Illinois-based company was founded in 1955. As of 2021, Dover's business was divided into five segments: Engineered Products, Clean Energy and Fueling, Imaging & Identification, Pumps & Process Solutions and Climate and Sustainability Technologies. Dover is a constituent of the S&P 500 index and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DOV. Dover was ranked 448 in the 2024 Fortu...
Lesaka Technologies is a South-African financial technology company that is listed on the NASDAQ and Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Lesaka’s primary focus is on financial inclusion, offering financial services to previously underserved communities and merchants.
DOV vs LSAK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $3.0B |
| Net Profit | $282.1M | $437.0K |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | 13.4% | 0.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.5% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.06 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 26 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $178.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $171.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $168.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $161.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $176.2M |
| Q3 26 | — | $437.0K | ||
| Q2 26 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 26 | $282.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $282.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $279.1M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $230.8M | $-22.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $-32.5M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.1% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.1% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.0% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | 25.7% |
| Q3 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 26 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 26 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 0.3% |
| Q3 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 26 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | -13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 96.4% | -18.4% |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $2.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.06 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.19 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.02 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.67 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.38 | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $3.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $13.4B | $11.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $72.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $76.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.6M |
| Q3 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $216.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $208.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $200.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $194.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $148.7M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $180.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $170.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $161.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $185.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | $193.3M |
| Q3 26 | — | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 26 | — | $11.7B | ||
| Q1 26 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $704.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.4B | $652.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2B | $653.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | $649.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5B | $640.6M |
| Q3 26 | — | — | ||
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | 1.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.42× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.42× | 0.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.