vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Dover Corporation (DOV) and PACS Group, Inc. (PACS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dover Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.5× PACS Group, Inc.). Dover Corporation runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 4.4%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PACS Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs 12.5%). Over the past eight quarters, PACS Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Dover Corporation is an American conglomerate manufacturer of industrial products. The Downers Grove, Illinois-based company was founded in 1955. As of 2021, Dover's business was divided into five segments: Engineered Products, Clean Energy and Fueling, Imaging & Identification, Pumps & Process Solutions and Climate and Sustainability Technologies. Dover is a constituent of the S&P 500 index and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DOV. Dover was ranked 448 in the 2024 Fortu...
DOV vs PACS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $282.1M | $59.7M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 7.0% |
| Net Margin | 13.4% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.5% | 18.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.2% | 3022.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.06 | $0.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $981.4M |
| Q1 26 | $282.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $282.1M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $279.1M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $230.8M | $28.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $347.1M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.8M | $-10.9M |
| Q1 26 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.5% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.7% | 22.3% |
| Q1 26 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.0% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 96.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | -1.1% |
| Q1 26 | $2.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.06 | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.19 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.02 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.67 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.38 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.51 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.04 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $197.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $353.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $946.8M |
| Total Assets | $13.4B | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | 0.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $355.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $294.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $287.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $157.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $73.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $353.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $411.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $946.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $871.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $806.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $750.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | $709.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $660.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $572.1M |
| Q1 26 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 0.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.42× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.55× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-3.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $543.9M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $424.2M | $204.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $212.3M | $52.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.5M | $150.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $439.0M | $64.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.2M | $209.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.7M | $34.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $487.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $370.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $325.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.93× | -0.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.40× | 3.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.76× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.68× | 5.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.31× | 33.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.02× | 13.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.