vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMDOCS LTD (DOX) and VIASAT INC (VSAT), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMDOCS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× VIASAT INC). AMDOCS LTD runs the higher net margin — 11.2% vs 2.2%, a 9.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VIASAT INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.0% vs 1.1%). Over the past eight quarters, AMDOCS LTD's revenue compounded faster (4.5% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Amdocs Limited is a multinational telecommunications technology company headquartered in Chesterfield, Missouri. The company specializes in software and services for communications, media and financial services providers and digital enterprises. Amdocs was founded in 1982 and is publicly traded on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
Viasat, Inc. is an American communications company based in Carlsbad, California, with additional operations across the United States and worldwide. Viasat is a provider of high-speed satellite broadband services and secure networking systems covering military and commercial markets.
DOX vs VSAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2024 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $140.3M | $25.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 11.2% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.1% | 3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12.0% | 115.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-61.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-56.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-246.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-158.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-137.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.3M | $-32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.5M | $-100.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | -2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.21 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.01 | $-1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $6.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $4.6B |
| Total Assets | — | $14.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.42× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $726.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 29.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $726.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $282.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $258.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $298.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $219.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $239.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $232.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 29.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOX
Segment breakdown not available.
VSAT
| Products | $334.2M | 29% |
| Aviation Services | $303.7M | 26% |
| Government Satcom Services | $202.4M | 17% |
| Maritime Services | $114.9M | 10% |
| Information Security And Cyber Defense Products | $97.0M | 8% |
| Tactical Networking Products | $93.9M | 8% |
| Navarino Uk And Jsat Mobile | $15.5M | 1% |
| Advanced Technologies And Other Products | $6.1M | 1% |
