vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Domino's (DPZ) and VEEVA SYSTEMS INC (VEEV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Domino's is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $811.2M, roughly 1.4× VEEVA SYSTEMS INC). VEEVA SYSTEMS INC runs the higher net margin — 29.1% vs 12.2%, a 17.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VEEVA SYSTEMS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.0% vs 3.5%). Over the past eight quarters, VEEVA SYSTEMS INC's revenue compounded faster (13.4% CAGR vs 3.0%).
Domino's Pizza, Inc. is an American multinational pizza restaurant chain founded in 1960. The corporation is Delaware-domiciled and headquartered at the Domino's Farms office park in Ann Arbor Township, near Ann Arbor, Michigan. As of 2018, Domino's had approximately 15,000 stores, with 5,649 in the United States, 1,500 in India, and 1,249 in the United Kingdom. Domino's has stores in more than 83 countries and 5,701 cities worldwide.
Veeva Systems Inc., headquartered in Pleasanton, California, provides cloud software, data, and business consulting for the life sciences industry. Its software is used to manage data, track regulatory registrations, and oversee supply chains. The company is a public benefit corporation.
DPZ vs VEEV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $811.2M |
| Net Profit | $139.8M | $236.2M |
| Gross Margin | 40.4% | 75.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.0% | 29.7% |
| Net Margin | 12.2% | 29.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.5% | 16.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.6% | 27.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.13 | $1.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $811.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $789.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $759.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $720.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $699.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $676.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $650.3M |
| Q1 26 | $139.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.3M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.1M | $228.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.7M | $195.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.4M | $185.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.9M | $171.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.0M | $161.7M |
| Q1 26 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 75.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.1% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 40.3% | 77.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.8% | 74.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.2% | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | 74.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.8% | 73.3% |
| Q1 26 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.7% | 30.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 26.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.1% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | 30.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | $4.13 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.08 | $1.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.81 | $1.37 | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.33 | $1.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.89 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.19 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.03 | $0.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $232.9M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $7.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $8.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $232.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $272.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $304.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $189.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $283.7M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.0B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9B | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.9B | $4.9B |
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $6.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $162.0M | $192.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $147.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.16× | 0.82× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $642.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $162.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $192.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $185.4M | $238.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $187.8M | $877.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.1M | $69.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.0M | $164.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $172.7M | $92.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.7M | $763.5M |
| Q1 26 | $147.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.33× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.43× | 3.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.20× | 0.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.05× | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.18× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | 4.72× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DPZ
| Supply chain | $699.0M | 61% |
| U.S. franchise royalties and fees | $158.0M | 14% |
| U.S. franchise advertising | $130.5M | 11% |
| U.S. Company-owned stores | $82.1M | 7% |
| International franchise royalties and fees | $81.0M | 7% |
VEEV
| Subscription Services Veeva Research And Development | $364.8M | 45% |
| Subscription Services Veeva Commercial Cloud | $317.6M | 39% |
| Professional Services Veeva Research And Development | $81.3M | 10% |
| Professional Services Veeva Commercial Cloud | $47.5M | 6% |
