vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) and F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.7× Leonardo DRS, Inc.). Leonardo DRS, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.6% vs 7.3%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 8.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.1% CAGR vs 6.1%).

Leonardo DRS, Inc. is a United States–based defense contractor. Originally founded as DRS Technologies, Inc. and traded on the NYSE, it was acquired by Leonardo’s predecessor Finmeccanica in 2008. Leonardo DRS provides advanced defense technologies and systems primarily to the U.S. military.

F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is a public company headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. It primarily provides annuities, life insurance, and pension buyout services. The company was founded in 1959.

DRS vs FG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FG
FG
1.7× larger
FG
$1.8B
$1.1B
DRS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FG
FG
+5.2% gap
FG
13.2%
8.1%
DRS
Higher net margin
DRS
DRS
2.4% more per $
DRS
9.6%
7.3%
FG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
DRS
DRS
Annualised
DRS
24.1%
6.1%
FG

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Revenue
$1.1B
$1.8B
Net Profit
$102.0M
$128.0M
Gross Margin
25.4%
Operating Margin
11.9%
Net Margin
9.6%
7.3%
Revenue YoY
8.1%
13.2%
Net Profit YoY
14.6%
-60.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.38
$0.97

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$960.0M
$1.7B
Q2 25
$829.0M
$1.4B
Q1 25
$799.0M
$908.0M
Q4 24
$981.0M
$1.6B
Q3 24
$812.0M
$1.4B
Q2 24
$753.0M
$1.2B
Q1 24
$688.0M
$1.6B
Net Profit
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
$102.0M
$128.0M
Q3 25
$72.0M
$118.0M
Q2 25
$54.0M
$40.0M
Q1 25
$50.0M
$-21.0M
Q4 24
$89.0M
$327.0M
Q3 24
$57.0M
$-6.0M
Q2 24
$38.0M
$203.0M
Q1 24
$29.0M
$115.0M
Gross Margin
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
25.4%
Q3 25
23.1%
Q2 25
23.8%
Q1 25
22.7%
Q4 24
24.0%
Q3 24
22.0%
Q2 24
22.4%
Q1 24
22.2%
Operating Margin
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
11.9%
Q3 25
9.7%
Q2 25
8.4%
Q1 25
7.4%
Q4 24
12.2%
Q3 24
9.2%
Q2 24
7.3%
Q1 24
6.3%
Net Margin
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
9.6%
7.3%
Q3 25
7.5%
7.0%
Q2 25
6.5%
2.9%
Q1 25
6.3%
-2.3%
Q4 24
9.1%
21.0%
Q3 24
7.0%
-0.4%
Q2 24
5.0%
17.3%
Q1 24
4.2%
7.3%
EPS (diluted)
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
$0.38
$0.97
Q3 25
$0.26
$0.85
Q2 25
$0.20
$0.26
Q1 25
$0.19
$-0.20
Q4 24
$0.34
$2.53
Q3 24
$0.21
$-0.08
Q2 24
$0.14
$1.55
Q1 24
$0.11
$0.88

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$647.0M
$1.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$321.0M
$2.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.7B
$4.8B
Total Assets
$4.5B
$98.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.12×
0.47×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
$647.0M
$1.5B
Q3 25
$309.0M
$2.2B
Q2 25
$278.0M
$1.9B
Q1 25
$380.0M
$3.3B
Q4 24
$598.0M
$2.3B
Q3 24
$198.0M
$3.5B
Q2 24
$149.0M
$3.5B
Q1 24
$160.0M
$2.4B
Total Debt
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
$321.0M
$2.2B
Q3 25
$326.0M
$2.2B
Q2 25
$331.0M
$2.2B
Q1 25
$335.0M
$2.2B
Q4 24
$340.0M
$2.2B
Q3 24
$345.0M
$2.0B
Q2 24
$351.0M
$2.0B
Q1 24
$356.0M
$1.7B
Stockholders' Equity
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
$2.7B
$4.8B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$4.8B
Q2 25
$2.6B
$4.4B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$4.4B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$4.0B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$4.3B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$3.7B
Q1 24
$2.4B
$3.5B
Total Assets
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
$4.5B
$98.4B
Q3 25
$4.2B
$96.1B
Q2 25
$4.1B
$91.8B
Q1 25
$4.1B
$88.0B
Q4 24
$4.2B
$85.0B
Q3 24
$3.9B
$84.1B
Q2 24
$3.8B
$78.5B
Q1 24
$3.8B
$74.4B
Debt / Equity
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
0.12×
0.47×
Q3 25
0.12×
0.46×
Q2 25
0.13×
0.50×
Q1 25
0.13×
0.51×
Q4 24
0.13×
0.55×
Q3 24
0.14×
0.47×
Q2 24
0.15×
0.56×
Q1 24
0.15×
0.49×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$425.0M
$1.2B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$376.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
35.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.17×
9.13×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$227.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
$425.0M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$107.0M
$937.0M
Q2 25
$-28.0M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$-138.0M
$956.0M
Q4 24
$443.0M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$59.0M
$2.1B
Q2 24
$34.0M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$-265.0M
$1.5B
Free Cash Flow
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
$376.0M
Q3 25
$77.0M
Q2 25
$-56.0M
Q1 25
$-170.0M
Q4 24
$414.0M
Q3 24
$47.0M
Q2 24
$0
Q1 24
$-275.0M
FCF Margin
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
35.5%
Q3 25
8.0%
Q2 25
-6.8%
Q1 25
-21.3%
Q4 24
42.2%
Q3 24
5.8%
Q2 24
0.0%
Q1 24
-40.0%
Capex Intensity
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
4.6%
Q3 25
3.1%
Q2 25
3.4%
Q1 25
4.0%
Q4 24
3.0%
Q3 24
1.5%
Q2 24
4.5%
Q1 24
1.5%
Cash Conversion
DRS
DRS
FG
FG
Q4 25
4.17×
9.13×
Q3 25
1.49×
7.94×
Q2 25
-0.52×
40.50×
Q1 25
-2.76×
Q4 24
4.98×
4.04×
Q3 24
1.04×
Q2 24
0.89×
5.20×
Q1 24
-9.14×
13.34×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons