vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Fifth Third Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.4× Leonardo DRS, Inc.). Fifth Third Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 47.7% vs 9.6%, a 38.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Leonardo DRS, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 6.4%). Fifth Third Bancorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($765.0M vs $376.0M).

Leonardo DRS, Inc. is a United States–based defense contractor. Originally founded as DRS Technologies, Inc. and traded on the NYSE, it was acquired by Leonardo’s predecessor Finmeccanica in 2008. Leonardo DRS provides advanced defense technologies and systems primarily to the U.S. military.

Fifth Third Bancorp is a bank holding company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. It is the parent company of Fifth Third Bank, which operates 1,087 branches and 2,400 automated teller machines, across 12 states: Ohio, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and West Virginia. It is on the list of largest banks in the United States and is ranked 321st on the Fortune 500. The name "Fifth Third" is derived from the names of the...

DRS vs FITB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FITB
FITB
1.4× larger
FITB
$1.5B
$1.1B
DRS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
DRS
DRS
+1.7% gap
DRS
8.1%
6.4%
FITB
Higher net margin
FITB
FITB
38.1% more per $
FITB
47.7%
9.6%
DRS
More free cash flow
FITB
FITB
$389.0M more FCF
FITB
$765.0M
$376.0M
DRS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Revenue
$1.1B
$1.5B
Net Profit
$102.0M
$730.0M
Gross Margin
25.4%
Operating Margin
11.9%
59.7%
Net Margin
9.6%
47.7%
Revenue YoY
8.1%
6.4%
Net Profit YoY
14.6%
17.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.38
$1.03

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$960.0M
$1.5B
Q2 25
$829.0M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$799.0M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$981.0M
$1.4B
Q3 24
$812.0M
Q2 24
$753.0M
Q1 24
$688.0M
Net Profit
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$102.0M
$730.0M
Q3 25
$72.0M
$649.0M
Q2 25
$54.0M
$628.0M
Q1 25
$50.0M
$515.0M
Q4 24
$89.0M
$620.0M
Q3 24
$57.0M
Q2 24
$38.0M
Q1 24
$29.0M
Gross Margin
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
25.4%
Q3 25
23.1%
Q2 25
23.8%
Q1 25
22.7%
Q4 24
24.0%
Q3 24
22.0%
Q2 24
22.4%
Q1 24
22.2%
Operating Margin
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
11.9%
59.7%
Q3 25
9.7%
55.1%
Q2 25
8.4%
54.0%
Q1 25
7.4%
45.4%
Q4 24
12.2%
53.3%
Q3 24
9.2%
Q2 24
7.3%
Q1 24
6.3%
Net Margin
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
9.6%
47.7%
Q3 25
7.5%
42.7%
Q2 25
6.5%
42.0%
Q1 25
6.3%
35.8%
Q4 24
9.1%
43.1%
Q3 24
7.0%
Q2 24
5.0%
Q1 24
4.2%
EPS (diluted)
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$0.38
$1.03
Q3 25
$0.26
$0.91
Q2 25
$0.20
$0.88
Q1 25
$0.19
$0.71
Q4 24
$0.34
$0.85
Q3 24
$0.21
Q2 24
$0.14
Q1 24
$0.11

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$647.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$321.0M
$13.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.7B
$21.7B
Total Assets
$4.5B
$214.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.12×
0.63×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$647.0M
Q3 25
$309.0M
Q2 25
$278.0M
Q1 25
$380.0M
Q4 24
$598.0M
Q3 24
$198.0M
Q2 24
$149.0M
Q1 24
$160.0M
Total Debt
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$321.0M
$13.6B
Q3 25
$326.0M
$13.7B
Q2 25
$331.0M
$14.5B
Q1 25
$335.0M
$14.5B
Q4 24
$340.0M
$14.3B
Q3 24
$345.0M
Q2 24
$351.0M
Q1 24
$356.0M
Stockholders' Equity
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$2.7B
$21.7B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$21.1B
Q2 25
$2.6B
$21.1B
Q1 25
$2.6B
$20.4B
Q4 24
$2.6B
$19.6B
Q3 24
$2.5B
Q2 24
$2.4B
Q1 24
$2.4B
Total Assets
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$4.5B
$214.4B
Q3 25
$4.2B
$212.9B
Q2 25
$4.1B
$210.0B
Q1 25
$4.1B
$212.7B
Q4 24
$4.2B
$212.9B
Q3 24
$3.9B
Q2 24
$3.8B
Q1 24
$3.8B
Debt / Equity
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
0.12×
0.63×
Q3 25
0.12×
0.65×
Q2 25
0.13×
0.69×
Q1 25
0.13×
0.71×
Q4 24
0.13×
0.73×
Q3 24
0.14×
Q2 24
0.15×
Q1 24
0.15×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$425.0M
$929.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$376.0M
$765.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
35.5%
50.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.6%
10.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.17×
1.27×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$227.0M
$3.9B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$425.0M
$929.0M
Q3 25
$107.0M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$-28.0M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$-138.0M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$443.0M
$-101.0M
Q3 24
$59.0M
Q2 24
$34.0M
Q1 24
$-265.0M
Free Cash Flow
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$376.0M
$765.0M
Q3 25
$77.0M
$886.0M
Q2 25
$-56.0M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$-170.0M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$414.0M
$-246.0M
Q3 24
$47.0M
Q2 24
$0
Q1 24
$-275.0M
FCF Margin
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
35.5%
50.0%
Q3 25
8.0%
58.3%
Q2 25
-6.8%
77.8%
Q1 25
-21.3%
77.7%
Q4 24
42.2%
-17.1%
Q3 24
5.8%
Q2 24
0.0%
Q1 24
-40.0%
Capex Intensity
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
4.6%
10.7%
Q3 25
3.1%
10.5%
Q2 25
3.4%
9.6%
Q1 25
4.0%
8.1%
Q4 24
3.0%
10.1%
Q3 24
1.5%
Q2 24
4.5%
Q1 24
1.5%
Cash Conversion
DRS
DRS
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
4.17×
1.27×
Q3 25
1.49×
1.61×
Q2 25
-0.52×
2.08×
Q1 25
-2.76×
2.39×
Q4 24
4.98×
-0.16×
Q3 24
1.04×
Q2 24
0.89×
Q1 24
-9.14×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons